10-Year Annuity vs 3–5–7 Ladder: Control, Yield & Optionality
One contract maximizes simplicity; a ladder injects decision windows and rate diversification. Here’s how to judge the trade-off—not on guesswork, but structure.
Quick Verdict
| Dimension | Single 10-Year Contract | 3–5–7 Ladder (Equal Thirds) |
|---|---|---|
| Initial Rate Exposure | One fixed long-term rate | Three staggered terms |
| Blended Yield | Highest single nominal rate (if premium exists) | Average of 3, 5, 7-year rates |
| Liquidity Windows | Major decision at year 10 (plus penalty-free %) | Maturities at years 3, 5, 7 create option checkpoints |
| Reinvestment Timing Risk | Concentrated in one future rate environment | Distributed across three future environments |
| Behavioral Discipline | Set & forget (risk of neglect near maturity) | Pre-scheduled review cadence |
| Early Need Risk | Unexpected need > penalty-free may trigger charges | Earlier rungs can satisfy needs without surrender |
| Future Strategy Paths | Limited until maturity (or partial withdrawals) | At each maturity: renew, 1035, shift to index/income |
| Complexity | One contract admin | Three contracts (slightly more admin) |
| Ideal Use Case | Highly stable funds, no mid-term pivots | Unknown mid-term goals or desire to adapt strategy |
1. Reinvestment Diversification
A single 10-year bet ties all proceeds to one future rate climate. Ladder maturities spread rate capture bets across three distinct future points.
2. Flexibility vs Yield Spread
If the 10-year premium over the ladder blend is minor (e.g., 0.25–0.35%), optionality often carries more real value than the incremental nominal yield.
3. Behavioral Friction
Big single maturities can be ignored until it’s almost too late. Ladder rungs force a structured, lower-stress review pattern.
4. Matching Uncertain Timing
If earliest possible needs cluster around years 4–6, the 10-year lock misaligns. Laddering surfaces earlier capital without penalties.
5. Future Strategy Staging
Want income later, not now? A maturing rung can shift into an income rider product when (and only when) you actually need it.
Illustrative Blended Yield
Example: 3Y 4.60%, 5Y 4.85%, 7Y 5.00% → Blend ≈ 4.82%. If 10Y = 5.15%, premium ≈ 0.33%. Is 0.33% worth losing three adaptation windows? Personalized calculation clarifies.
Build Your Ladder Blend
We’ll send a concise breakdown with current rates and blended yield vs a single 10-year.
Quick FAQ
Ready to See Your Ladder Blend?
One quick input gives you the blended yield and adaptation windows vs a single 10-year commitment.
Show My Ladder vs Single Rate