855-583-1104

When Should I Claim Social Security? Age 62 vs. 67 vs. 70 Compared

Updated May 13, 2026

Social Security at 62 vs. 67 vs. 70: Which Claiming Age Pays the Most?

The short answer

Claiming Social Security at 62 permanently cuts your benefit to 70% of what you would get at full retirement age. Waiting to 67 (the FRA for anyone born in 1960 or later) gives you 100%. Waiting to 70 boosts it to 124%.

On a $2,000 FRA benefit, that is $1,400 at 62, $2,000 at 67, or $2,480 at 70. Over a 20-year retirement, the gap between claiming at 62 and claiming at 70 can exceed $100,000 in total lifetime benefits.

This guide compares all three claiming ages head-to-head, shows real-dollar examples, and explains how married couples, health, and bridge income should shape the decision.

Social Security at 62 vs. 67 vs. 70: Side-by-Side Comparison

Here is the core comparison every retiree wants to see. The numbers assume a $2,000 monthly benefit at full retirement age (born 1960 or later, FRA = 67).

Claiming Age % of FRA Benefit Monthly Benefit Annual Benefit Best Suited For
62 70% $1,400 $16,800 Poor health, immediate income need, lower-earning spouse
67 (FRA) 100% $2,000 $24,000 Average health, balanced approach, retirees who keep working
70 124% $2,480 $29,760 Good health, savings to bridge the gap, higher-earning spouse

Three numbers tell the story: waiting from 62 to 67 raises your monthly check by 43%. Waiting from 67 to 70 adds another 24%. From 62 to 70, your monthly benefit nearly doubles, going from $1,400 to $2,480.


62 vs. 67: When Does Full Retirement Age Beat Claiming Early?

Claiming at 67 pays more per month for life, but you give up five years of $1,400 checks (totaling $84,000) to get there. The break-even age is roughly 78. If you live past 78, claiming at FRA produced more lifetime income. If you do not, claiming at 62 was the better call.

Most retirees in average health live well past 78. According to the SSA life expectancy tables, a 62-year-old American today has a roughly 50% chance of reaching age 85 or older. That is why financial planners default to FRA over 62 unless health or income circumstances dictate otherwise.

Claim at 62 over 67 if: you have a serious health condition, you need the cash flow now and have no bridge income, or you are the lower earner in a married couple while your spouse delays.

Claim at 67 over 62 if: you are in average or good health, you have other income or savings to bridge to FRA, or you plan to continue working part-time (the earnings test penalizes early claimers who keep working).


67 vs. 70: When Does Delaying to 70 Pay Off?

Every month you delay past FRA earns a delayed retirement credit of 2/3 of 1%, which compounds to 8% per year. By 70, your monthly check is 24% higher than at FRA. That increase is locked in for life and is fully cost-of-living adjusted thereafter.

The 8% guaranteed delay credit is one of the best risk-free returns available anywhere in retirement. No CD, Treasury bond, or fixed annuity offers an 8% guaranteed, inflation-adjusted lifetime income increase. For retirees in good health, the math strongly favors delaying.

The break-even between 67 and 70 is roughly age 82. If you live past 82, waiting from FRA to 70 pays out more in total. If you live to 90, the delay strategy can produce $80,000 or more in additional lifetime income, plus a larger survivor benefit for a spouse.

The catch: you have to fund three years of expenses (ages 67 to 70) without Social Security. For retirees with $200,000 or more in savings, that gap is manageable. For those without, FRA is usually the practical ceiling. See our guide on the annuity bridge strategy for how to fund the delay without depleting savings.


62 vs. 70: The Big Trade-Off

This is the widest spread on the table. Claiming at 62 gives you $1,400 per month starting eight years sooner. Claiming at 70 gives you $2,480 per month, but you go without Social Security entirely from 62 to 70.

Here is the running math, again using a $2,000 FRA benefit:

  • From age 62 to 70 (8 years, 96 months): claiming early pays $134,400 total. Claiming at 70 pays $0.
  • After age 70: the late claimer collects $1,080 more per month than the early claimer.
  • Catch-up period: $134,400 head start ÷ $1,080 per month gap = about 124 months, or 10.3 years.
  • Break-even age: roughly 80 years old.

Live to 85? Claiming at 70 produced about $65,000 more in lifetime income. Live to 90? Roughly $130,000 more. Live to 75 and pass away? Claiming at 62 paid out more, by about $60,000.

“The break-even between claiming at 62 and claiming at 67 is around age 78, and the break-even between claiming at 67 and claiming at 70 is around age 82. If you expect to live past 78, claiming at full retirement age may be worth more. But break-evens are a useful tool, not the only factor.”

– Justin D. Rucci, CFP®, Wealth Advisor, Warren Street Wealth Advisors


What Is Your Full Retirement Age (FRA)?

Your Full Retirement Age is the age at which you collect 100% of your earned Social Security benefit. For anyone born in 1960 or later, FRA is 67. For people born between 1943 and 1959, FRA falls between 66 and 67, in two-month increments.

Use the Full Retirement Age chart to find your exact FRA before running any of the calculations in this guide. Everything else (early-claim reductions and delayed credits) is measured against your specific FRA, not a generic 67.


Full Claiming Age Comparison: 62 Through 70

The three headline ages (62, 67, 70) get most of the attention, but you can claim any month between them. Each age in between has its own benefit reduction or credit.

Claiming Age % of FRA Benefit Monthly Benefit ($2,000 FRA) Break-Even vs. FRA
62 70% $1,400 ~Age 77-78
63 75% $1,500 ~Age 78
64 80% $1,600 ~Age 78-79
65 86.7% $1,733 ~Age 79
66 93.3% $1,867 ~Age 80
67 (FRA) 100% $2,000 N/A (baseline)
68 108% $2,160 ~Age 81
69 116% $2,320 ~Age 82
70 124% $2,480 ~Age 82-83

For a personalized calculation, run your own numbers through our Social Security break-even age tool.


Married Couples: Who Should Claim at 62, 67, or 70?

For most married couples, the optimal strategy is for the higher earner to delay to 70 while the lower earner claims earlier. This pattern maximizes lifetime household income and, more importantly, protects the surviving spouse.

When one spouse dies, the survivor keeps the larger of the two benefits, not both. If the higher earner claimed at 62 and locked in a 30% reduction, that reduced amount becomes the survivor benefit for life. Delaying the higher earner’s claim to 70 raises the survivor benefit by up to 77% (from 70% of FRA to 124% of FRA), often for two more decades of widowhood.

Real Example: Robert and Linda, Both Born in 1960

Robert’s projected FRA benefit: $2,800/month. Linda’s: $1,400/month. Both are 62.

Option A: Both claim at 62.
Robert collects $1,960 (70% of $2,800). Linda collects $980 (70% of $1,400). Combined: $2,940/month.

Option B: Linda claims at 62, Robert delays to 70.
From age 62 to 70, the household lives on Linda’s $980/month plus savings. At 70, Robert’s benefit becomes $3,472 (124% of $2,800). Combined: $4,452/month.

The gap: $1,512 more per month once Robert hits 70. Over 15 years of joint retirement, that compounds to over $270,000 in extra lifetime income, plus a much larger survivor benefit if Robert dies first.

Option B does require bridge income from Robert’s age 67 to 70. That is exactly where an annuity bridge strategy can replace Social Security during the delay window. Review spousal benefit rules before finalizing.


The Annuity Bridge Strategy: Delay to 70 Without Running Out of Cash

An annuity bridge uses a short-term fixed annuity or immediate annuity to replace the Social Security income you would have collected at 62, so you can delay claiming without burning through investment accounts. The annuity pays out during the gap years; Social Security kicks in later at the maximized amount.

The math works especially well for retirees with $200,000 or more in savings who are in good health. Rather than locking in a permanently reduced benefit, they bridge the income gap with annuity payments and then collect the larger lifetime benefit from age 70 onward. MyAnnuityStore has placed over $1 billion in annuities for retirees using exactly this strategy.

For a full breakdown, see the annuity bridge strategy and best annuities for Social Security bridging.


What About the Earnings Test If You Keep Working?

If you claim before FRA and continue working, the Social Security earnings test temporarily withholds part of your benefit. In 2026, SSA withholds $1 for every $2 you earn above $22,320 per year.

This is not a permanent loss. Withheld benefits are recalculated and added back once you reach FRA. But the cash flow interruption surprises many early claimers who did not plan for it. If you intend to keep working, waiting until at least FRA to claim is almost always cleaner.

At FRA and beyond, there is no earnings test. You can collect 100% of your Social Security benefit and earn unlimited income from work.


How to Decide Between 62, 67, and 70

Five factors drive the right claiming age for most retirees. Run through them in order before committing to an irreversible decision.

  • Health and life expectancy. Serious illness or family history of early mortality favors claiming at 62 or 63. Good health and family longevity favors waiting to 70.
  • Other income or savings. No bridge income forces an earlier claim. $200,000+ in savings or a working spouse opens up the delay option.
  • Marital status. Higher earner in a couple should delay; lower earner can claim early. The survivor benefit makes this lopsided strategy mathematically dominant.
  • Plans to keep working. The earnings test penalizes early claimers who keep earning. If you are working past 62, wait until FRA.
  • Risk tolerance. Some retirees value the certainty of income now over a larger but conditional payout later. That is a valid preference, not a math mistake.

For deeper tactical playbooks, see Social Security optimization strategies.


Frequently Asked Questions

Is it better to take Social Security at 62, 67, or 70?

For most retirees in average or better health, claiming at 67 (FRA) or 70 produces more lifetime income than claiming at 62. The break-even point is roughly 78 for 62-vs-67 and roughly 82 for 67-vs-70. Claim at 62 only if you have a shortened life expectancy, no other income, or are the lower earner in a married couple.

How much more do I get if I wait until 70 instead of 62?

Waiting to 70 instead of claiming at 62 increases your monthly benefit by about 77% (from 70% of FRA to 124% of FRA). On a $2,000 FRA benefit, that is $2,480 per month at 70 versus $1,400 at 62, a difference of $1,080 per month for life.

What is the break-even age for Social Security?

The break-even age depends on which two claiming ages you compare. Roughly: 62 vs. 67 breaks even around age 78. 67 vs. 70 breaks even around age 82. 62 vs. 70 breaks even around age 80. Live past the break-even and the later claim wins; die before it and the earlier claim paid out more.

Can my spouse get a benefit if I delay claiming?

A spousal benefit cannot be claimed until you yourself have filed. If you delay to 70, your spouse must wait or claim on their own record. However, delaying maximizes the survivor benefit your spouse will receive if you die first, which is often the single largest reason for the higher earner to wait.

What happens to my Social Security if I die before 70?

If you delayed claiming and die before collecting, you receive nothing. Your surviving spouse, however, receives the larger of their own benefit or your earned benefit (including any delayed credits you accrued before death). For an unmarried person with poor health, this is a meaningful argument for claiming earlier.


Related Reading


Sources and Further Reading:

Get Today's Best MYGA Rates
Compare top annuity companies. Rates up to 6.50%. No obligation.
Editorial Disclosure: Our editorial team independently reviews and rates annuity products. We may earn commissions when you request a quote through our partner links. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Learn more.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, tax, or legal advice. Annuity products vary by state and carrier. Always consult a licensed financial professional before making any financial decisions. My Annuity Store is an independent marketplace and does not provide investment advice.
Where to Go Next
Based on what you just read, here are your best next steps.

Pros and Cons of Fixed Annuities

Before you commit to a fixed annuity, weigh the advantages and drawbacks for your retirement situation.

✓  Pros

  • Guaranteed rate locked in for the full term, no surprises
  • Principal is 100% protected from market losses
  • Often pays significantly more than CDs or savings accounts
  • Tax-deferred growth, no annual tax bill until withdrawal
  • Up to 10% annual free withdrawal without surrender charge
  • State guaranty association coverage (typically up to $250,000)
  • Simple to understand, no moving parts or index tracking

✗  Cons

  • Surrender charges apply if you withdraw more than 10% early
  • Not FDIC insured. Backed by the insurance company, not the government
  • Earnings taxed as ordinary income (not capital gains rates)
  • 10% IRS early-withdrawal penalty before age 59½
  • Rate is fixed, so you won't benefit if market rates rise
  • Less liquidity than a savings account or money market

Learn more: Are annuities safe?

Compare Top MYGA Rates by Term

See today's highest guaranteed rate from an A-rated carrier for each term length.

See all rates →

Rates sourced from AnnuityRateWatch. A-rated carriers (AM Best) only. Not a solicitation. Rates vary by state. Verify before purchasing.

Types of Annuities

Insurance companies offer several types of annuities to fit different financial goals. Here's how they compare.

A MYGA (Multi-Year Guaranteed Annuity) is the simplest fixed annuity. Your rate is guaranteed for the entire term of 3, 5, or 7 years. No market exposure, no index tracking. What you see is what you earn.

Best for: Savers who want a predictable, guaranteed return and are comfortable locking funds for a set term. Often compared to CDs but frequently pays more.

Learn more about MYGAs →

A Fixed Indexed Annuity (FIA) links your interest credits to a market index (like the S&P 500) with a floor of 0%, so you can never lose principal. Upside is capped via participation rates or caps.

Best for: Investors who want some market participation with a safety net. More complex than MYGAs but potentially higher returns in strong market years.

Learn more about FIAs →

A SPIA (Single Premium Immediate Annuity) converts a lump sum into a guaranteed income stream: monthly checks that start within 30 days and continue for life or a set period.

Best for: Retirees who need guaranteed income immediately and want to eliminate the risk of outliving their money. The "pension replacement" product.

Learn more about SPIAs →

A Variable Annuity invests your premium in sub-accounts (similar to mutual funds). Returns fluctuate with the market, so you can earn more but can also lose principal.

Best for: Long-term investors who want market exposure inside a tax-deferred wrapper and are comfortable with investment risk. Higher fees than fixed products.

Learn more about variable annuities →

A RILA (Registered Index-Linked Annuity) offers partial market participation with a defined buffer against losses (e.g., 10% or 20%). Unlike FIAs, RILAs can lose money, but losses are limited.

Best for: Investors willing to accept limited downside in exchange for higher upside potential than a traditional FIA. A middle ground between fixed and variable.

Learn more about RILAs →

Rate Methodology

My Annuity Store monitors MYGA rates from 90+ top annuity companies via AnnuityRateWatch. Our rate data refreshes every 6 hours.

To make our list, a carrier must be rated A− or better by AM Best, a financial strength rating that indicates the insurer's ability to meet obligations. Carriers with ratings of B++ or lower are excluded regardless of how attractive their rate appears.

Rates are sorted by highest guaranteed APY within each term group. Products using simple interest (SI) are labeled. The effective compound yield is lower than the stated rate. Minimum premiums shown are for non-qualified (after-tax) purchases.

Data: AnnuityRateWatch · A-rated carriers only · Updated daily
People Also Read
Related guides and resources our readers find most helpful.

Explore More

Get Free Quote Call Now